Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Drug-Loaded Extracellular Vesicle-Based Drug Delivery: Advances, Loading Strategies, Therapeutic Applications, and Clinical Challenges

Dieu LL., Kazsoki A., Zelkó R.

Systematic Review on Systemic / IV, published in Pharmaceutics (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Pharmaceutics (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41599152
PMCID
PMC12845221
DOI
10.3390/pharmaceutics18010045
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Background/Objectives : Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanosized carriers with high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and the ability to cross biological barriers, making them attractive for drug delivery. Despite growing interest, the clinical translation of drug-loaded EVs remains limited. This systematic review aimed to summarize current evidence on EV sources, loading strategies, therapeutic applications, and translational challenges. Methods : Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Reaxys, and Scopus for the period 2020-2025. Eligible studies included original articles on drug-loaded EVs from human, animal, plant, or other sources. Data on EV source, drug type, particle size, loading method, administration route, and therapeutic application were extracted. Clinical trials were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. Results : A total of 65 studies were included after screening 5316 records, along with two clinical trials. Human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived EVs were the most frequent source in oncology, while plant-derived EVs predominated in non-oncology applications. Anti-cancer drugs such as doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and docetaxel were most frequently loaded, alongside curcumin, berberine, and atorvastatin. EV sizes generally ranged from 50 to 200 nm, with larger vesicles reported for plant-derived EVs. Intraven

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research