Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Effect of 980 nm photobiomodulation delivered by a handpiece with Gaussian vs. Flat-Top profiles on proliferation and differentiation of buccal fat pad stem cells.

Homayouni A., Rezaie Rad M., Barikani H., Chiniforush N., Akbari S.

Laboratory Study, published in Photochem Photobiol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Photochem Photobiol (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38462542
DOI
10.1111/php.13929

Abstract (original English)

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Gaussian and Flat-Top profiles in proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell of buccal fat pad. Based on the timing schedule and type of laser handpieces, the cells were assigned to a control group with no radiation, and two irradiation test groups (980 nm) with Flat-Top (F) (power of 1.1 W, beam area of 1 cm 2 ) and standard Gaussian (G) (power of 0.7 W, beam area of 0.5 cm 2 ) handpieces. Each test group was divided into three subgroups, receiving one time (60 J/cm 2 ), two times (120 J/cm 2 ), and three times (180 J/cm 2 ) irradiation. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Annexin V tests were performed. The Alizarin Red staining and polymerase chain reaction tests were done both at the beginning and the end of the first and second weeks. The degree of mineralization and expression of osteogenic markers, RUNX2, OCN, and OPN were evaluated. Based on the MTT and Annexin V test results, both test groups outperformed the control group in degrees of cell proliferation during the first day of laser irradiation (p < 0.05). After one and two times irradiation, the expression of osteogenic markers in the test groups was significantly higher than the control group. PBM with Flat-Top and Gaussian handpieces can enhance ossification and cell differentiation regardless of the t

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell DifferentiationCell ProliferationAdipose TissueHumansLow-Level Light TherapyMesenchymal Stem CellsNormal DistributionStem CellsCells, Cultured

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.