Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The Effect of Antinociceptive Dose of Morphine on Cell Therapy in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

Farrokhfar S., Tiraihi T., Movahedin M., Azizi H.

Animal Study on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Mol Neurobiol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Mol Neurobiol (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39012442
DOI
10.1007/s12035-024-04350-x

Abstract (original English)

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a sensory-motor injury. Today, combined treatments such as cell therapy along with drug therapy and their interactions are of interest. Morphine is an opioid drug used to relieve intolerable pain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an antinociceptive dose of morphine (with minimal tolerance/dependence but effective pain relief) on cell therapy in SCI. The antinociceptive dose of morphine was determined in rats with SCI through the Hargreaves and naloxone-induced morphine withdrawal tests. The rats were then allocated to 5 groups: laminectomy, SCI, SCI + Morphine, SCI + cell therapy, SCI + Morphine + cell therapy. The antinociceptive dose (5 mg/kg) was administered on days 1, 4, 10, and 13 (i.p.) post-SCI. On day 7, Neural-like stem cells derived from adipose tissue were transplanted intraspinally into the injured animals, and they were monitored for 12 weeks. The outcomes were assessed using the BBB test, somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), and histology. The BBB test indicated that morphine significantly hindered functional recovery post-cell transplantation compared to animals receiving only cell therapy (p < 0.05). In the SSEP test, the analysis of amplitude and latency of waves did not reveal a significant difference (p > 0.05). The histological results showed that cell therapy reduced the cavity size post-SCI, while morphine had no sig

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsMorphineSpinal Cord InjuriesMaleRats, Sprague-DawleyCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyRatsAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvoked Potentials, Somatosensory

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research