Effect of ascorbic and chondrogenic derived decellularized extracellular matrix from mesenchymal stem cells on their proliferation, viability and differentiation.
Pérez-Castrillo S., González-Fernández ML., López-González ME., Villar-Suárez V.
Animal Study, published in Ann Anat (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Ann Anat (2018)
- Country
- Germany
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 30114449
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.07.006
- Citations
- 15
Abstract (original English)
Background The development and application of biomaterials to promote stem cell proliferation and differentiation has undergone major expansion over the last few years. Decellularized stem cell matrix (DSCMs) represent bioactive and biocompatible materials which achieve similar characteristics of native extracellular matrix. DSCMs have given promising outcomes in generating novel cell culture substrates mimicking specific niche microenvironments in tissue engineering. Aims This research aims at producing two different DSCMs obtained from adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, characterize them and evaluate the DSCMs bioactivity on mesenchymal stem cells. Methods DSCMs were produced using ascorbic or chondrogenic medium, which were then used as a scaffold for adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, respectively. The biological characteristics of both types of DSCMs, including cell attachment, morphology, proliferation, viability, and chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation were evaluated and compared. Results Differences between ascorbic derived-DSCMs and chondrogenic derived DSCMs were found. Chondrogenic derived-DSCMs remained compact and stronger during extraction and this made their handling easier. Ascorbic derived-DSCMs showed a different protein composition to chondrogenic-DSCMs. Bioactive
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.