Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Effect of calcium phosphate ceramic substrate geometry on mesenchymal stromal cell organization and osteogenic differentiation.

Urquia Edreira ER., Hayrapetyan A., Wolke JG., Croes HJ., Klymov A., Jansen JA.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Biofabrication (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biofabrication (2016)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27150445
DOI
10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025006

Abstract (original English)

The composition of calcium phosphate (CaP) ceramics in combination with surface features have been shown to influence biological performance, and micro- and nano-scale topography is known to stimulate osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). In view of this, adipose tissue derived MSCs were cultured on CaP disks featuring hemispherical concavities of various sizes (440, 800 or 1800 μm diameter). It was hypothesized that (i) surface concavities would promote cell proliferation, cellular organization within the concavities, and osteogenic differentiation, as a result of a more pronounced 3D micro-environment and CaP nucleation in concavities, and (ii) MSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation would increase with smaller concavity size due to more rapidly occurring 3D cell-cell interactions. We found that concavities indeed affect cell proliferation, with 440 μm concavities increasing cell proliferation to a larger extent compared to 800 and 1800 μm concavities as well as planar surfaces. Additionally, concavity size influenced 3D cellular organization within the concavity volume. Interestingly, concavity size promoted osteogenic differentiation of cells, as evidenced by increased osteocalcin gene expression in 440 μm concavities, and osteocalcin staining predominantly for 440 and 800 μm concavities, but not for 1800 μm concavities and only slightly f

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Calcium PhosphatesCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCeramicsHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteocalcinOsteogenesisTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research