Effect of the combination of mesenchymal stromal cells and chondroitinase ABC on chronic spinal cord injury.
Lee SH., Kim Y., Rhew D., Kuk M., Kim M., Kim WH.
Animal Study on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Cytotherapy (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Cytotherapy (2015)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 26188966
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcyt.2015.05.012
Abstract (original English)
Transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been identified as a potential therapeutic modality for treating spinal cord injury (SCI). Degradation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) using the enzyme chondroitinase ABC (chABC) can promote functional recovery after SCI. The effect of the simultaneous administration of MSCs and chABC on chronic SCI was investigated. Sixteen dogs were assigned to one of the following four groups: (i) canine adipose tissue-derived MSCs (cADMSCs), (ii) chABC, (iii) cADMSCs + chABC and (iv) control. Treatments were carried out 3 weeks after SCI; cADMSCs (1 × 10(7) cells suspended in 150 μL of PBS), chABC (5 U/mL, 150 μL), cADMSCs + chABC (1 × 10(7) cells suspended in 150 μL of chABC), or phosphate-buffered saline (150 μL) were injected into the spinal cord at three locations to a depth of 3 mm using a 30-gauge needle. The spinal cord was harvested 8 weeks after transplantation. In a behavioral assessment, dogs treated with cADMSCs + chABC and cADMSCs alone showed significantly better functional recovery 8 weeks after transplantation compared with the control and chABC groups (P < 0.05). In addition, the combination of cADMSCs and chABC increased the expression of digested CSPGs (2B6), β3 tubulin, and NF-M. However, the levels of COX2 (P < 0.05), and tumor necrosis factor-α was higher in the treatment groups than in the control. I
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as biomarker in stem cell-based therapies of preclinical spinal cord injury models: A systematic review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Tissue Cell (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Tissue Cell3 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Revolutionizing neural regeneration with smart responsive materials: Current insights and future prospects
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Bioact Mater5 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 42 on Diabetic Foot, Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 42
Adv Sci (Weinh)18 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurosci