Effect of Hydrogen Dioxide Treatment on the Osteogenic Potential of Duck-beak Bone-derived Natural Bioceramic Microparticles.
Kim JH., Park MH., Jang SJ., Son SJ., Lee JY., Son JS.
Animal Study, published in In Vivo (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- In Vivo (2017)
- Country
- Greece
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 28438865
- PMCID
- PMC5461447
- DOI
- 10.21873/invivo.11069
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
As an alternative material to the autogenous bone, duck-beak bone particle for bone substitute have been attracting great attention due to their biological properties. To deliver the most favorable outcome of medical treatment, it is essential to study the effect of various processing methods of the duck-beak bone. In this study, we compared the two deproteinizing agents for manufacturing duck-beak bone. Group 1 was treated by a conventional chemical agent (ethylenediamine) and Group 2 by hydrogen dioxide (H 2 O 2 ). In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted in parallel to compare the cytocompatibility and osteogenic capability between two processing methods. For in vitro tests, human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAD-MSCs) were planted onto each sample and their attachment and growing were evaluated. For in vivo biocompatibility and osteogenic properties, the samples were applied on the critical-sized calvarial bone defect of rats. Group 2 showed significantly higher cell attachment but Group1 showed slightly higher cell proliferation. In in vivo tests, all groups have shown biocompatibility and increased level of osteogenic potential. However, Group 2 had significantly higher bone regeneration (p<0.05). This experiment confirmed that H 2 O 2 can be an optimal processing method for duck-beak bone particle.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.