Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMC

[Effect of the local application of stem cells on repairing facial nerve defects: a systematic review]

Zhao D., Li YH., Yang ZY., Cai T., Wu XY., Xia Y.

Meta-analysis on Face & Skin, published in Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32037768
PMCID
PMC7184294
DOI
10.7518/hxkq.2020.01.011

Abstract (original English)

Objective To systematically evaluate the repairing effect of stem cells on facial nerve defects. Methods Articles regarding the regenerating effect of stem cells on facial nerves in animals were collected from the databases of Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CBM. Two professionals independently completed the article screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment. RevMan 5.3 and random-effects models were used for the statistical analysis, and the results were presented in the form of mean differences (MD) with a 95%CI. The results of functional evaluation (vibrissae movement, facial paralysis) and histological evaluation (density of myelinated fibers, diameter of fibers, thickness of myelin sheath, G ratio) of facial nerve were Meta-analyzed. Results A total of 4 614 articles were retrieved from the 6 databases, and 15 of these articles were included in the Meta-analysis. For vibrissae movement and facial paralysis, the stem cell group scored significantly higher than the non-stem cell group (P Conclusions Stem cells have potential in promoting facial nerve regeneration.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
Facial NerveStem CellsVibrissaeAnimalsFacial ParalysisNerve Regeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research