The effect and mechanism of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells on scar formation in rat uterine incision
Li C., Zhao F., Song J., Zhang T., Yang R., Xiao Y.
Animal Study on Scar, published in Cell Transplant (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Cell Transplant (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41169129
- PMCID
- PMC12678918
- DOI
- 10.1177/09636897251387398
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Cesarean section (CS) scar tissue fibrosis and decreased muscle density increase the risk of uterine rupture and placental implantation in subsequent pregnancies. Given the potent anti-fibrotic and regenerative properties of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (hAMSCs), this study investigated their therapeutic potential in repairing uterine scars in a rat model. A full-thickness uterine wall excision model was established to mimic CS scarring. hAMSCs were transplanted at the edge of the incision. Myometrial thickness and collagen deposition within the scar were assessed histologically using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's staining. Immunohistochemistry evaluated the expression of MMP8, TGF-β1, VEGFA, and α-SMA within the scar region. mRNA transcriptome sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were employed to explore possible mechanisms. A total of 110 rats were used in the study, 30 in the sham group, 40 in the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group and 40 in the hAMSCs treatment group. Compared with the PBS group, the hAMSCs group exhibited a 35% reduction in collagen fiber area and a 28% increase in smooth muscle cell density ( P P < 0.05). Transcriptome sequencing and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR results showed that the expression levels of Wnt4, Fzd5, Wnt5a, and PPARD genes were lower in the uterine scar region
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations