Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

The effect and mechanism of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells on scar formation in rat uterine incision

Li C., Zhao F., Song J., Zhang T., Yang R., Xiao Y.

Animal Study on Scar, published in Cell Transplant (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Cell Transplant (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41169129
PMCID
PMC12678918
DOI
10.1177/09636897251387398
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Cesarean section (CS) scar tissue fibrosis and decreased muscle density increase the risk of uterine rupture and placental implantation in subsequent pregnancies. Given the potent anti-fibrotic and regenerative properties of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells (hAMSCs), this study investigated their therapeutic potential in repairing uterine scars in a rat model. A full-thickness uterine wall excision model was established to mimic CS scarring. hAMSCs were transplanted at the edge of the incision. Myometrial thickness and collagen deposition within the scar were assessed histologically using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson's staining. Immunohistochemistry evaluated the expression of MMP8, TGF-β1, VEGFA, and α-SMA within the scar region. mRNA transcriptome sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) were employed to explore possible mechanisms. A total of 110 rats were used in the study, 30 in the sham group, 40 in the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group and 40 in the hAMSCs treatment group. Compared with the PBS group, the hAMSCs group exhibited a 35% reduction in collagen fiber area and a 28% increase in smooth muscle cell density ( P P < 0.05). Transcriptome sequencing and real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR results showed that the expression levels of Wnt4, Fzd5, Wnt5a, and PPARD genes were lower in the uterine scar region

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
UterusCicatrixAmnionMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPregnancy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research