Effective Label-Free Sorting of Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Clinical Bone Marrow Samples
Zia S., Cavallo C., Vigliotta I., Parisi V., Grigolo B., Buda R.
Prospective Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Bioengineering (Basel) (2022)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 35200403
- PMCID
- PMC8869157
- DOI
- 10.3390/bioengineering9020049
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) make up less than 1% of the bone marrow (BM). Several methods are used for their isolation such as gradient separation or centrifugation, but these methodologies are not direct and, thus, plastic adherence outgrowth or magnetic/fluorescent-activated sorting is required. To overcome this limitation, we investigated the use of a new separative technology to isolate MSCs from BM; it label-free separates cells based solely on their physical characteristics, preserving their native physical properties, and allows real-time visualization of cells. BM obtained from patients operated for osteochondral defects was directly concentrated in the operatory room and then analyzed using the new technology. Based on cell live-imaging and the sample profile, it was possible to highlight three fractions (F1, F2, F3), and the collected cells were evaluated in terms of their morphology, phenotype, CFU-F, and differentiation potential. Multipotent MSCs were found in F1: higher CFU-F activity and differentiation potential towards mesenchymal lineages compared to the other fractions. In addition, the technology depletes dead cells, removing unwanted red blood cells and non-progenitor stromal cells from the biological sample. This new technology provides an effective method to separate MSCs from fresh BM, maintaining their native characteristics and avoiding cell manipulat
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci