Effectiveness and Safety of Mechanical Debridement for Treating Experimental Peri-Implantitis in Elderly Rats Receiving Oncological Dosages of Zoledronate
Toro LF., Souza EQM., Ganzaroli VF., Freire JOA., Costa LLD., Pereira EL.
Animal Study, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Int J Mol Sci (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41683778
- PMCID
- PMC12898286
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijms27031355
Abstract (original English)
This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of mechanical debridement (MD) in treating experimental peri-implantitis (EPI) in rats with osseointegrated implants, specifically those treated with high-dose zoledronate. Senescent Wistar rats underwent the extraction of their upper incisor, followed by immediate implant placement. After 8 weeks, the implants were exposed, and a transmucosal component was placed. The animals were divided into four groups: Control (C), ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD. In the 9th week, drug treatment commenced, consisting of the administration of 0.45 mL of a vehicle (for group C) or zoledronate (for groups ZOL, ZOL-EPI, and ZOL-EPI-MD) every 4 days over 10 weeks. After 5 weeks of drug treatment, a cotton bandage was placed around the implants to induce EPI in the ZOL-EPI and ZOL-EPI-MD groups. In the ZOL-EPI-MD group, the ligature was removed at week 16, and local treatment was performed using MD. Euthanasia was conducted at week 19. Histological sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for histopathological and histometric analyses, such as the percentage of total bone tissue (B.Ar/T.Ar) and the percentage of non-vital bone tissue (NVB.Ar/B.Ar). Immunohistochemical reactions were performed to detect TNFα, IL-1β, VEGF, OCN, and TRAP. In the peri-implant connective tissue, mild, intense, and moderate inflammatory infiltrates were o
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.