Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Effects of Cell-Free Fat Extract and Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Scar Maturation in an Experimental Rabbit Ear Wound Model

Wei Z., Zhang M., Chen M., Song Y., Wang Y.

Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 3 on Scar, published in Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol (2024)
Reported sample size
3
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39712941
PMCID
PMC11662919
DOI
10.2147/ccid.s489625
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Background Multiple methods have been used to treat hypertrophic scarring; however, an optimal treatment method remains to be established. We aimed to research and compare the effects of cell-free fat extract (CEFFE) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on hypertrophic scar formation based on histomorphological analysis in this study. Methods Twelve rabbits were divided into four groups randomly. (CEFFE+PRF group, n=3; CEFFE group, n=3, PRF group, n=3 and Control group, n=3). After the ear hypertrophic scar model were established, the two ears of each rabbit in the four groups were injected with CEFFE 0.05 mL/cm 2 + PRF 0.05 mL/cm 2 , CEFFE 0.1 mL/cm 2 , PRF 0.1 mL/cm 2 , and saline 0.1 mL/cm 2 , respectively. The scar elevation index and histological analysis using hematoxylin-eosin and Masson staining were evaluated after injection on day 40. Results The CEFFE+PRF group was significantly more effective in the prevention of pathological scar formation than the CEFFE-only, PRF-only, and control groups in terms of capillary count, collagen organization, fibroblast count, and scar elevation index ( p Discussion CEFFE combined with PRF was the most effective treatment for the prevention of hypertrophic scar formation in our study.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research