Effects of Combined Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Schwann Cells Transplantation on Neuropathic Pain in Complete Spinal Cord Injury: A Phase II Randomized Active-Controlled Trial
Akhlaghpasand M., Tavanaei R., Hosseinpoor M., Heidari R., Mohammadi I., Chamanara M.
Clinical Trial on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Cell Transplant (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Cell Transplant (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39874104
- PMCID
- PMC11775971
- DOI
- 10.1177/09636897241298128
- Citations
- 8
Abstract (original English)
Neuropathic pain is a debilitating complication following spinal cord injury (SCI). Currently, effective treatments for SCI-induced neuropathic pain are highly lacking. This clinical trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of combined intrathecal injection of Schwann cells (SCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in improving SCI-induced neuropathic pain. This study was a parallel-group, randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase II trial with two arms, including treatment and control groups. Patients with complete SCI-induced neuropathic pain in the treatment group received a single combined intrathecal injection of BMSCs and SCs. Study outcome measures were International SCI Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). A total of 37 (55.2%) and 30 (44.8%) patients in the treatment and control groups were followed up for 6 months, respectively. Significant reductions in mean scores of interference items in the treatment group, including daily activities ( P P P P = 0.002), mean ( P = 0.001), and worst ( P = 0.001) numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity scores showed significant reductions in the treatment group after 6 months compared with the control one. Based on multiple regression analysis controlled for potential confounders, significant associations between changes in a
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as biomarker in stem cell-based therapies of preclinical spinal cord injury models: A systematic review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Tissue Cell (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Tissue Cell3 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Revolutionizing neural regeneration with smart responsive materials: Current insights and future prospects
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Bioact Mater5 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 42 on Diabetic Foot, Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 42
Adv Sci (Weinh)18 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurosci