Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Effects of Insulin, Metoprolol and Deferoxamine on Fat Graft Survival.

Okyay MF., Kömürcü H., Bağhaki S., Demiröz A., Aydın Ö., Arslan H.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30937476
DOI
10.1007/s00266-019-01363-z
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

The main problem faced with fat grafting is unpredictable resorption rates. Many substances have been reported to increase the survival of fat grafts. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of insulin, metoprolol and deferoxamine on fat graft survival. Inguinal fat pads of male Sprague-Dawley rats were harvested and split into four parts as grafts. The grafts were placed in subcutaneous pockets in four quadrants on the back area of the rats. The insulin and metoprolol group fat grafts were incubated in regular insulin and metoprolol solutions, until they were placed. Deferoxamine and control group fat grafts were placed without incubation. After surgery, the control group fat grafts were injected with 10 doses of NaCl solution once every 3 days, and the deferoxamine group fat grafts were injected with 10 doses of deferoxamine solution once every 3 days. After a graft maturation period of 3 months, the grafts were harvested for weight measurements and histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. According to the rate of perilipin staining, the metoprolol group had 30% more mature viable adipocytes than the control and insulin group fat grafts (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). CD31 activation rates were significantly higher in the deferoxamine and insulin group than in the metoprolol group (p < 0.05). CD34 staining rates did not differ between any groups (p > 0

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsDeferoxamineGraft SurvivalInsulinMaleMetoprololRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research