Effects of mesenchymal stem cells in renovascular disease of preclinical and clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) causes severe renovascular hypertension, worsening kidney function, and increased cardiovascular morbidity. According to recent studies, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) administration is a promising therapy for the improvement of RAS outcomes. The meta-analysis aims to evaluate the therapeutic effects of MSC therapy on RAS. We performed a search in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 5, October 2022. We included 16 preclinical and 3 clinical studies in this meta-analysis. In preclinical studies, the pooled results indicated that animals treated with MSCs had lower levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (SMD = - 1.019, 95% CI - 1.434 to - 0.604, I 2 = 37.2%, P = 0.000), serum creatinine (Scr) (SMD = - 1.112, 95% CI - 1.932 to - 0.293, I 2 = 72.0%, P = 0.008), and plasma renin activity (PRA) (SMD = - 0.477, 95% CI - 0.913 to 0.042, I 2 = 43.4%, P = 0.032). The studies also revealed increased levels of renal blood flow (RBF) in stenotic kidney (STK) (SMD = 0.774, 95% CI - 0.351 to 1.197, I 2 = 0%, P = 0.000) and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of STK (SMD = 1.825, 95% CI 0.963 to 2.688, I 2 = 72.6%, P = 0.000). In clinical studies, the cortical perfusion and fractional hypoxia of the contralateral kidney (CLK) were alleviated by MSC therapy. Taken together, this meta-analysis revealed that MSCs therapy might be a

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.