Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Effects of two-dimensional materials on human mesenchymal stem cell behaviors.

Suhito IR., Han Y., Kim DS., Son H., Kim TH.

Laboratory Study, published in Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2017)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28867185
DOI
10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.149
Citations
23

Abstract (original English)

Graphene, a typical two-dimensional (2D) material, is known to affect a variety of stem cell behaviors including adhesion, spreading, growth, and differentiation. Here, we report for the first time the effects of four different emerging 2D materials on human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs). Graphene oxide (GO), molybdenum sulfide (MoS 2 ), tungsten sulfide (WS 2 ), and boron nitride (BN) were selected as model two-dimensional materials and were coated on cell-culture substrates by a drop-casting method. Acute toxicity was not observed with any of the four different 2D materials at a low concentration range (<5 μg/ml). Interestingly, the 2D material-modified substrates exhibited a higher cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation when compared with a non-treated (NT) substrate. Remarkably, in the case of differentiation, the MoS 2 -, WS 2 -, and BN-modified substrates exhibited a better performance in terms of guiding the adipogenesis of hADMSCs when compared with both NT and GO-modified substrates, based on the mRNA expression level (qPCR) and amount of lipid droplets (ORO staining). In contrast, the osteogenesis was found to be most efficiently induced by the GO-coated substrate (50 μg/mL) among all 2D-material coated substrates. In summary, 2D materials could act as favorable sources for controlling the stem cell growth and differentiation, which might be hi

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Biocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEquipment DesignGraphiteHumansMaterials Testing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.