Efficacy of autologous stem cells for bone regeneration during endosseous dental implants insertion - A systematic review of human studies.

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Availability of adequate quantity and quality of bone is prerequisite for longevity and survival of endosseous dental implants. Most of the clinicians face with the problem of lack of bone due to long-standing edentulism during this treatment modality. Conventional therapies with the use of various types of bone grafts and membranes have provided clinicians with unpredictable and compromised results. Cell-based therapies utilizing undifferentiated cells, that have the potential to differentiate into various cell types including osteoblastic lineages, have demonstrated through various previously conducted in-vitro and animal studies, a successful formation of bone in a predictable manner. Thus the main objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of these therapies when applied on human subjects. A search was carried out in MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for completed randomized and non-randomised clinical trials utilizing stem cell-based therapies with histologic and radiographic analysis written in English up to January 2019. This search of the literature yielded 10 studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In all these studies, stem cells were primarily used to achieve bone augmentation during insertion of endosseous dental implants. Results of these therapies conducted on human subjects have shown a positive impact on bone regen

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.