The efficacy of extracellular vesicles for acute lung injury in preclinical animal models: a meta-analysis
Zhang X., Cheng Z., Zeng M., He Z.
Meta-analysis, published in BMC Pulm Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Meta-analysis
- Journal
- BMC Pulm Med (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 38481171
- PMCID
- PMC10935944
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12890-024-02910-4
- Citations
- 3
Abstract (original English)
Background With the increasing research on extracellular vesicles (EVs), EVs have received widespread attention as biodiagnostic markers and therapeutic agents for a variety of diseases. Stem cell-derived EVs have also been recognized as a new viable therapy for acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). To assess their efficacy, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing preclinical experimental animal models of EVs for ALI treatment. Methods The database was systematically interrogated for pertinent data encompassing the period from January 2010 to April 2022 concerning interventions involving extracellular vesicles (EVs) in animal models of acute lung injury (ALI). The lung injury score was selected as the primary outcome measure for statistical analysis. Meta-analyses were executed utilizing RevMan 5.3 and State15.1 software tools. Results The meta-analyses comprised 31 studies, exclusively involving animal models of acute lung injury (ALI), categorized into two cohorts based on the presence or absence of extracellular vesicle (EV) intervention. The statistical outcomes from these two study groups revealed a significant reduction in lung injury scores with the administration of stem and progenitor cell-derived EVs (SMD = -3.63, 95% CI [-4.97, -2.30], P Conclusion In preclinical animal models of acute lung injury (ALI), the administration of extrac
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.