Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMC

Efficacy of Heterologous Type I Collagen Injections in Treating Atrophic Acne Scars: A Prospective Study

Gkouvi A., Tsiogka A., Corbo A., Tsimpidakis A., Gregoriou S.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 30 on Scar, published in Skin Appendage Disord (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Skin Appendage Disord (2025)
Reported sample size
30
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40771444
PMCID
PMC12324723
DOI
10.1159/000544166

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Treatment of acne scars includes laser therapies, microneedling, chemical peels, and dermal fillers. Herein, we sought to assess the efficacy and safety of heterologous type I collagen injections (HT1Cs) on atrophic acne scars. Methods One hundred milligrams of HT1C were injected beneath each atrophic acne scar on patients with atrophic acne scars graded as 2, 3, or 4 according to the Goodman and Baron's acne scar grading system. Patients underwent four treatment sessions at 2-week intervals, and they were evaluated for up to week 52, using the above-mentioned grading system and a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS). Results 30 patients (9 males: 21 females; median [range] age 32 [18-50] years) were enrolled in the study. At baseline, 10 (33%), 17 (57%), and 3 (10%) patients presented with grade 2, 3, and 4 scaring. At 3-month follow-up, 7 (23%), 16 (53%), 4 (13%), and 3 (10%) of patients presented with grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 scaring, respectively. At the same visit, physicians rated the mean improvement as 6.8, while patients rated it slightly higher at 7.2. The observed improvements were sustained up to 12 months. The mean patients' satisfaction rate at 3 months was 7.4. No major adverse events were reported throughout the entire duration of the follow-up period. Conclusion The results of the present study highlight the efficacy, sustainability, and safety of HT1C inj

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research