Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Efficacy of orthobiologic adjuvants to core decompression for hip preservation in avascular necrosis hip

Kumar P., Shetty VD., Dhillon MS.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in J Hip Preserv Surg (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Hip Preserv Surg (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33948198
PMCID
PMC8081433
DOI
10.1093/jhps/hnaa051
Citations
21

Abstract (original English)

Head preserving modalities in avascular necrosis (AVN) hip are variably effective in early stages, and further options that could prevent head distortion and osteoarthritis are needed. Core decompression (CD) is the most commonly used surgery in the early stages of osteonecrosis with variable rates of success. The present review aimed to determine the effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) or their combination with CD in early stages of AVN hip, prior to collapse of femoral head. Additionally, any newer unexplored modalities were also searched for and ascertained. PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for relevant articles in English language describing CD with aforementioned orthobiologics. We analysed a total of 20 studies published between 2011 and 2020. There were 6 retrospective and 14 prospective studies. PRP showed improved survival and functional outcomes; however, with only three studies, there is inconclusive evidence for its routine utilization. BMAC enhances the efficacy of CD which can further be increased by culture and expansion of cells or combining it with PRP to stimulate growth. In conclusion, CD with BMAC works more efficiently than CD alone prior to collapse of femoral head in AVN. However, PRP needs more evidence for extensive application. Addition of PRP to BMAC or cultur

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research