Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMedOpen access

Efficacy and safety of autologous adipose-derived stem cells in subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Seok J., Kim SY., Lee WG., Shin MK., Lee DH., Seo YJ.

Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 114 on Scar, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2025)
Country
England
Reported sample size
114
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41331725
PMCID
PMC12673732
DOI
10.1186/s13287-025-04763-y
NCT
NCT04137562

Abstract (original English)

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin condition affecting patients' well-being, but conventional treatments have limitations. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) present a promising option for AD therapy, though large-scale clinical studies are scarce. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of autologous adipose tissue-derived MSC (AtMSC) in moderate to severe AD refractory to conventional treatments. This multicenter, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial included 114 participants. Participants received two intravenous injections of AtMSCs or placebo at 4-week intervals. Clinical assessments, comprising Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), were performed every 4 weeks for 16 weeks total. Biomarker analyses were conducted using ELISA. Statistically significant differences between the treatment and placebo groups in EASI total score were observed at 8, 12, and 16 weeks (P = .0.017, 0.015, < 0.001). At week 16, 23.7% [14/59] of participants in the treatment group achieved a 75% or greater reduction in EASI total score (EASI-75), compared to 7.3% [4/55] in the placebo group, with a statistically significant difference (P = .016). In addition, SCORAD, disease severity, and IGA score were also improved in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, the

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansDermatitis, AtopicMaleFemaleAdultAdipose TissueMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationSingle-Blind MethodMiddle AgedMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research