Efficacy and safety of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with tadalafil in the treatment of severe erectile dysfunction: a retrospective cohort study
Gao QQ., Wang J., Li DS., Dai YT., Li ZR., Zhao XZ.
Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 27, published in Transl Androl Urol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Retrospective Study
- Journal
- Transl Androl Urol (2024)
- Reported sample size
- 27
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39434752
- PMCID
- PMC11491205
- DOI
- 10.21037/tau-24-154
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Background Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is an effective and safe treatment for mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining LIPUS with tadalafil in treating severe ED. Methods The data from 27 patients treated with LIPUS alone (group A) and 21 patients treated with a combination of LIPUS and daily 10 mg tadalafil (group B) were retrospectively analyzed. The LIPUS regimen consisted of twice-weekly treatments for 4 consecutive weeks. The treatment was considered effective if the change in International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) score after treatment was greater than or equal to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (the MCID for severe ED is 7 points). The effectiveness, IIEF-EF score, erectile hardness score (EHS), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), and adverse events were evaluated before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment. Results Compared to pre-treatment, both groups showed significant improvement in IIEF-EF score and EHS at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment (P 0.05). The effective rate did not significantly differ between group A (9/27, 33.3%) and group B (10/21, 47.62%) at 4 weeks or between group A (9/27, 33.3%) and group B (12/21, 57.14%) at 12 weeks after treatment (P=0.32, P=0.10). However, i
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.