[Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and Meta-analysis].
Huang MH., Zhao JY., Shang XJ., Liu YJ.
Meta-analysis, published in Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Meta-analysis
- Journal
- Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue (2025)
- Country
- China
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 40788245
Abstract (original English)
Objective To assess the safety, efficacy and potential impact of stem cell therapy (SCT) in improving erectile dysfunction (ED). Methods A comprehensive search strategy was used to search the literatures on safety and efficacy evaluation of stem cell (SC) in the treatment of ED by human clinical trials from PubMed, Embase and Web of science databases with a search time frame from database creation to July 4, 2024. The exclusion criteria were as follows: reviews, conference abstracts, animal experiments, and duplicate sample literature. Results The study initially screened 1 773 papers, and 17 were included in the final analysis. These studies involved a total of 269 ED patients, and a variety of sources of stem cells had been used in the treatment of ED, including adipose-derived stem cells, bone marrow-derived stem cells, placental stroma-derived stem cells, umbilical cord-derived stem cells, dental pulp-derived stem cells, and oral mucosa-derived stem cells. All studies were conducted by injecting stem cells into the cavernous body of the penis, but there is no fixed standard for the amount of injection, injection site and number of injections. The optimal treatment mode was still being explored. Patients' International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores and Erection Hardness Score (EHS), peak systolic velocity (PSV), and end diastolic velocity (EDV) improved after trea
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.