Electrical stimulation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells co-cultured in a conductive scaffold for potential orthopaedic applications.
Zhang J., Neoh KG., Kang ET.
Laboratory Study, published in J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2017)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 28482125
- DOI
- 10.1002/term.2441
- Citations
- 47
Abstract (original English)
Electrical stimulation (ES) has emerged as a useful tool to regulate cell behaviour, but the effect of ES on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)/vasculogenic cell co-culture has not been investigated. Herein, human adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) and umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were co-cultured in an electrically conductive polypyrrole/chitosan scaffold. Compared with AD-MSC monoculture, calcium deposition in the co-culture without and with ES (200 μA for 4 h/day) was 139% and 346% higher, respectively, after 7 days. As the application of ES to AD-MSC monoculture only increased calcium deposition by 56% compared with that without ES after 7 days, these results indicate that ES and co-culture with HUVECs have synergistic effects on AD-MSCs' osteogenic differentiation. ES application also significantly enhanced CD31 expression of HUVECs. In HUVEC monoculture, application of ES increased CD31 expression by 224%, whereas the corresponding increase in AD-MSC/HUVEC co-culture with ES application was 62%. The gene expression results indicate that ES enhanced the cellular functions in AD-MSC and HUVEC monoculture via autocrine bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), respectively. In co-culture, crosstalk between AD-MSCs and HUVECs due to paracrine BMP-2 and VEGF enhanced the cellular functions compared with the respective monoculture. Wi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.