Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Electrical stimulation for cartilage tissue engineering - A critical review from an engineer's perspective

Zimmermann J., Farooqi AR., van Rienen U.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in Heliyon (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Heliyon (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39416819
PMCID
PMC11481755
DOI
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38112
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Cartilage has a limited intrinsic healing capacity. Hence, cartilage degradation and lesions pose a huge clinical challenge, particularly in an ageing society. Osteoarthritis impacts a significant number of the population and requires the development of repair and tissue engineering methods for hyaline articular cartilage. In this context, electrical stimulation has been investigated for more than 50 years already. Yet, no well-established clinical therapy to treat osteoarthritis by means of electrical stimulation exists. We argue that one reason is the lack of replicability of electrical stimulation devices from a technical perspective together with lacking hypotheses of the biophysical mechanism. Hence, first, the electrical stimulation studies reported in the context of cartilage tissue engineering with a special focus on technical details are summarized. Then, an experimental and numerical approach is discussed to make the electrical stimulation experiments replicable. Finally, biophysical hypotheses have been reviewed on the interaction of electric fields and cells that are relevant for cartilage tissue engineering. With that, the aim is to inspire future research to enable clinical electrical stimulation therapies to fight osteoarthritis.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research