Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Electrical stimulation enhances sciatic nerve regeneration using a silk-based conductive scaffold beyond traditional nerve guide conduits.

Soltani Khaboushan A., Azimzadeh A., Behboodi Tanourlouee S., Mamdoohi M., Kajbafzadeh AM., Slavin KV.

Animal Study, published in Sci Rep (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Sci Rep (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38956215
PMCID
PMC11219763
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-65286-9
Citations
11

Abstract (original English)

Despite recent advancements in peripheral nerve regeneration, the creation of nerve conduits with chemical and physical cues to enhance glial cell function and support axonal growth remains challenging. This study aimed to assess the impact of electrical stimulation (ES) using a conductive nerve conduit on sciatic nerve regeneration in a rat model with transection injury. The study involved the fabrication of conductive nerve conduits using silk fibroin and Au nanoparticles (AuNPs). Collagen hydrogel loaded with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) served as the filling for the conduit. Both conductive and non-conductive conduits were applied with and without ES in rat models. Locomotor recovery was assessed using walking track analysis. Histological evaluations were performed using H&E, luxol fast blue staining and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, TEM analysis was conducted to distinguish various ultrastructural aspects of sciatic tissue. In the ES + conductive conduit group, higher S100 (p < 0.0001) and neurofilament (p < 0.001) expression was seen after 6 weeks. Ultrastructural evaluations showed that conductive scaffolds with ES minimized Wallerian degeneration. Furthermore, the conductive conduit with ES group demonstrated significantly increased myelin sheet thickness and decreased G. ratio compared to the autograft. Immun

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsNerve RegenerationSciatic NerveRatsTissue ScaffoldsGoldRats, Sprague-DawleySilkMesenchymal Stem CellsElectric Stimulation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.