Electrospinning PLLA/PCL Blend Fibre-Based Materials and Their Biomedical Application: A Mini Review
Meng C.
Narrative Review, published in Polymers (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Polymers (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41150343
- PMCID
- PMC12567890
- DOI
- 10.3390/polym17202802
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Fibres play a crucial role in diverse biomedical applications, ranging from tissue engineering to drug delivery. Electrospinning has emerged as a simple and versatile technique for producing ultrafine fibres at micro- to nanoscale dimensions. Synthetic biopolymers are effective cues to replace damaged tissue in the biomedical field, both in vitro and in vivo applications. Among them, poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) is a renewable, environmentally friendly biopolymer material. Polycaprolactone (PCL) is a synthetic polymer with good biocompatibility and biodegradation characteristics. However, both electrospun PLLA and PCL fibres have their limitations. To overcome these shortcomings, electrospinning PLLA/PCL blend fibres has been the subject of many studies. This review discusses the different parameters for the electrospinning of PLLA/PCL-based fibres for biomedical applications. Furthermore, we also discuss how electrospun PLLA/PCL-based scaffolds can be modified or combined with other biomaterials, such as natural polymers and bioceramics, and examine their in vitro and in vivo applications in various tissue repair strategies.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.