Emerging <i>in vitro</i> models to study Merkel cell carcinoma pathobiology
Mazziotta C., Rotondo JC.
Narrative Review, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Cell Dev Biol (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41142922
- PMCID
- PMC12549617
- DOI
- 10.3389/fcell.2025.1691110
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive skin neoplasm, caused in approximately 80% of cases by the genomic integration of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and the expression of the viral small T antigen (sT) and large T antigen (LT) oncoproteins. Virus-negative tumors exhibit extensive UV-induced mutations. Despite such divergent molecular characteristics, the two etiologies share similar morphological and clinical features. The development of novel preclinical in vitro models that effectively recapitulate MCC pathobiology is essential for understanding the mechanisms of MCPyV infection and the cellular ancestry of MCC, a central topic of ongoing investigation and debate. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models developed to investigate the molecular and cellular mechanisms of MCC onset and progression. Continuous refinement of cell models that recapitulate MCC pathobiology is essential for advancing our understanding of the mechanisms of tumor onset and progression, thereby enhancing clinical applications for MCC patients.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.