Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Emerging nanomaterials capable of effectively facilitating osteoblast maturation

Elkhenany H.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, Back & Spine, published in Nanomedicine (Lond) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Nanomedicine (Lond) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40421912
PMCID
PMC12233895
DOI
10.1080/17435889.2025.2511465
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Efficient osteoblast maturation is essential for successful bone regeneration, yet achieving this goal remains challenging. This review explores the emerging role of nanomaterials in promoting osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. A literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection in February 2025, covering publications from 2014 to 2024 and limited to articles and proceedings. Keywords included "nanoparticles" and "osteoblast." Among the most extensively studied nanomaterials were hydroxyapatite, carbon-based, and bioactive glass nanoparticles (NPs). These materials influence osteoblast function through intracellular mechanisms, including enhanced mitochondrial activity, autophagy, and osteoinductive gene expression. Additionally, they modulate the extracellular microenvironment by mimicking the native bone matrix, releasing bioactive ions, and reducing inflammation and oxidative stress. Notably, several NP-based systems have reached clinical application, including Signafuse (a bioactive calcium phosphate composite), nanoLOCK (a nanostructured titanium spinal implant), and Vitoss (a synthetic bone graft of nanocrystalline calcium phosphate). More recently, multimodal NPs that integrate different NP types and combine surface roughness, ion release, and chemical cues offer synergistic effects. These materials provide a dual-function approach, target

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
OsteoblastsAnimalsHumansBone RegenerationCell DifferentiationOsteogenesisNanostructuresNanoparticles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research