Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Emerging strategies for tissue engineering in vascularized composite allotransplantation: A review

Ren D., Chen J., Yu M., Yi C., Hu X., Deng J.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in J Tissue Eng (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Tissue Eng (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
38826796
PMCID
PMC11143860
DOI
10.1177/20417314241254508
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), which can effectively improve quality of life, is a promising therapy for repair and reconstruction after face or body trauma. However, intractable issues are associated with VCA, such as the inevitable multiple immunogenicities of different tissues that cause severe rejection, the limited protocols available for clinical application, and the shortage of donor sources. The existing regimens used to extend the survival of patients receiving VCAs and suppress rejection are generally the lifelong application of immunosuppressive drugs, which have side effects. Consequently, studies aiming at tissue engineering methods for VCA have become a topic. In this review, we summarize the emerging therapeutic strategies for tissue engineering aimed to prolong the survival time of VCA grafts, delay the rejection and promote prevascularization and tissue regeneration to provide new ideas for future research on VCA treatment.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research