Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Endoplasmic reticulum stress: an emerging therapeutic target for preeclampsia†

Chen M., Jin Y., Cao X.

Narrative Review on Chronic Inflammation, published in Biol Reprod (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biol Reprod (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40156296
PMCID
PMC12260504
DOI
10.1093/biolre/ioaf071
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Preeclampsia (PE), a common obstetric complication during pregnancy, has a global prevalence of 5-8%, and it is one of the leading causes of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, which has a lack of effective treatment other than termination of pregnancy. Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) is a self-stress response of cells to alleviate misfolded and unfolded protein aggregation and calcium ion homeostasis disorders in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen by activating the unfolded protein response. Many studies have demonstrated a potential link between ERS and PE pathogenesis by mediating genetic susceptibility, placental hypoxia, oxidative stress, metabolic disorders, impaired angiogenesis and function, and inflammatory responses. This article systematically describes the ERS mechanisms and their association with the pathological progression of PE. It also emphasizes that ERS can be a potential therapeutic target for PE clinical management. Highlights

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancyFemaleUnfolded Protein ResponseEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research