Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Endothelial and stem cell interactions on dielectrophoretically aligned fibrous silk fibroin-chitosan scaffolds.

Gupta V., Davis G., Gordon A., Altman AM., Reece GP., Gascoyne PR.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in J Biomed Mater Res A (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Biomed Mater Res A (2010)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
20186770
DOI
10.1002/jbm.a.32720
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Regenerative tissue engineering requires biomaterials that would mimic structure and composition of the extracellular matrix to facilitate cell infiltration, differentiation, and vascularization. Engineered scaffolds composed of natural biomaterials silk fibroin (SF) and chitosan (CS) blend were fabricated to achieve fibrillar nano-structures aligned in three-dimensions using the technique of dielectrophoresis. The effect of scaffold properties on adhesion and migration of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC) and endothelial cells (HUVEC) was studied on SFCS (micro-structure, unaligned) and engineered SFCS (E-SFCS; nano-structure, aligned). E-SFCS constituted of a nano-featured fibrillar sheets, whereas SFCS sheets had a smooth morphology with unaligned micro-fibrillar extensions at the ends. Adhesion of hASC to either scaffolds occurred within 30 min and was higher than HUVEC adhesion. The percentage of moving cells and average speed was highest for hASC on SFCS scaffold as compared to hASC cocultured with HUVEC. HUVEC interactions with hASC appeared to slow the speed of hASC migration (in coculture) on both scaffolds. It is concluded that the guidance of cells for regenerative tissue engineering using SFCS scaffolds requires a fine balance between cell-cell interactions that affect the migration speed of cells and the surface characteristics that affects the overall adhesi

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCell MovementCells, CulturedChitosanCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsFibroinsHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research