Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone

Roux BM., Cheng MH., Brey EM.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in J Cell Mol Med (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Cell Mol Med (2015)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
25877690
PMCID
PMC4420594
DOI
10.1111/jcmm.12569
Citations
39

Abstract (original English)

Vascularization remains one of the most important challenges that must be overcome for tissue engineering to be consistently implemented for reconstruction of large volume bone defects. An extensive vascular network is needed for transport of nutrients, waste and progenitor cells required for remodelling and repair. A variety of tissue engineering strategies have been investigated in an attempt to vascularize tissues, including those applying cells, soluble factor delivery strategies, novel design and optimization of bio-active materials, vascular assembly pre-implantation and surgical techniques. However, many of these strategies face substantial barriers that must be overcome prior to their ultimate translation into clinical application. In this review recent progress in engineering vascularized bone will be presented with an emphasis on clinical feasibility.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Bone and BonesAnimalsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsBone TransplantationTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationOsteogenesisNeovascularization, PhysiologicTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research