Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Engineering an extracellular matrix-functionalized, load-bearing tendon substitute for effective repair of large-to-massive tendon defects.

Huang S., Rao Y., Zhou M., Blocki AM., Chen X., Wen C.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Scar, published in Bioact Mater (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Bioact Mater (2024)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38481565
PMCID
PMC10933390
DOI
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.02.032
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

A significant clinical challenge in large-to-massive rotator cuff tendon injuries is the need for sustaining high mechanical demands despite limited tissue regeneration, which often results in clinical repair failure with high retear rates and long-term functional deficiencies. To address this, an innovative tendon substitute named "BioTenoForce" is engineered, which uses (i) tendon extracellular matrix (tECM)'s rich biocomplexity for tendon-specific regeneration and (ii) a mechanically robust, slow degradation polyurethane elastomer to mimic native tendon's physical attributes for sustaining long-term shoulder movement. Comprehensive assessments revealed outstanding performance of BioTenoForce, characterized by robust core-shell interfacial bonding, human rotator cuff tendon-like mechanical properties, excellent suture retention, biocompatibility, and tendon differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Importantly, BioTenoForce, when used as an interpositional tendon substitute, demonstrated successful integration with regenerative tissue, exhibiting remarkable efficacy in repairing large-to-massive tendon injuries in two animal models. Noteworthy outcomes include durable repair and sustained functionality with no observed breakage/rupture, accelerated recovery of rat gait performance, and >1 cm rabbit tendon regeneration with native tendon-like biomechanical attribute

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research