Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

Enhanced Bladder Regeneration with Adipose-Derived Stem Cell-Seeded Silk Fibroin Scaffolds: A Comparative Analysis.

Hendawy H., Farag A., Elhaieg A., Metwllay E., Shimada K., Elfadadny A.

Animal Study on Chronic Inflammation, published in Biomimetics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Biomimetics (Basel) (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39997116
PMCID
PMC11852737
DOI
10.3390/biomimetics10020093
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Effective bladder reconstruction remains a significant challenge in urology, particularly for conditions requiring partial or complete bladder replacement. In this study, the efficacy is evaluated of two types of scaffolds, silk fibroin (SF) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs-SF), in promoting bladder regeneration and their associated outcomes. A rat model was used to compare the surgical outcomes and morphological recovery of bladder tissues implanted with SF and ADSCs-SF scaffolds. Post-operative recovery, including voiding ability and complication rates, was assessed. The morphological and histological changes of the regenerated bladder tissue were evaluated at multiple time points (2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) using gross tissue analysis, histometric assessments, and immunohistochemical staining. Both scaffold types demonstrated successful integration into the bladder wall with no significant differences in body weight or voiding issues. The SF scaffold group exhibited graft shrinkage and a 41.6% incidence of bladder calculus formation. In contrast, the ADSCs-SF scaffold facilitated superior morphological restoration, with bladder tissue progressively adopting a more normal shape and no incidence of bladder calculus. Histological analysis revealed that the ADSCs-SF scaffold significantly promoted the regeneration of a more organized urothelium layer and smooth muscle tissue. I

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research