ER-mitochondria contacts mediate lipid radical transfer via RMDN3/PTPIP51 phosphorylation to reduce mitochondrial oxidative stress
Shiiba I., Ito N., Oshio H., Ishikawa Y., Nagao T., Shimura H.
Animal Study, published in Nat Commun (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Nat Commun (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39929810
- PMCID
- PMC11811300
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-025-56666-4
- Citations
- 46
Abstract (original English)
The proximal domains of mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are linked by tethering factors on each membrane, allowing the efficient transport of substances, including lipids and calcium, between them. However, little is known about the regulation and function of mitochondria-ER contacts (MERCs) dynamics under mitochondrial damage. In this study, we apply NanoBiT technology to develop the MERBiT system, which enables the measurement of reversible MERCs formation in living cells. Analysis using this system suggests that induction of mitochondrial ROS increases MERCs formation via RMDN3 (also known as PTPIP51)-VAPB tethering driven by RMDN3 phosphorylation. Disruption of this tethering caused lipid radical accumulation in mitochondria, leading to cell death. The lipid radical transfer activity of the TPR domain in RMDN3, as revealed by an in vitro liposome assay, suggests that RMDN3 transfers lipid radicals from mitochondria to the ER. Our findings suggest a potential role for MERCs in cell survival strategy by facilitating the removal of mitochondrial lipid radicals under mitochondrial damage.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.