Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease: from biologics to nanomedicine-enabled therapies

Kaltsas A., Hatzichristou D.

Narrative Review, published in Sex Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Sex Med (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42022377
PMCID
PMC13097027
DOI
10.1093/sexmed/qfag019

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease are prevalent and frequently coexisting disorders in which guideline-based therapies improve symptoms more reliably than they reverse underlying corporal remodeling or tunical fibrosis. Regenerative biologics and nano-enabled delivery systems aim to intervene upstream in inflammatory and fibrotic pathways by improving local exposure, tissue persistence, and target engagement within the emerging field of regenerative sexual medicine. Objectives To synthesize current evidence on regenerative biologics and nano-enabled delivery platforms for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease, with emphasis on disease-specific delivery barriers, payload characterization, and translational readiness. Methods This article was designed as a narrative translational review informed by a scoping search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2000 to March 2025), supplemented by hand-searching of reference lists. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively by disease context (erectile dysfunction vs Peyronie's disease), payload class, delivery constraints, and translational maturity. Results For erectile dysfunction, platelet-rich plasma has widespread clinical uptake but remains limited by heterogeneous preparation methods, placebo susceptibility, and rapid corporal washout. Early stem cell studies support feasibility, yet conve

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.