Evaluating tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction: a comparison of in vivo response to meshes implanted in rats.
Wang X., Chen Y., Fan Z., Hua K.
Animal Study with a reported sample of 6, published in Int Urogynecol J (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Int Urogynecol J (2021)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- 6
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 34741620
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00192-021-05008-1
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Achieving better anatomic restoration and decreasing the associated complications are necessary for material repair of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). This study was aimed to investigate host response to tissue-engineered repair material (TERM) in rat models by comparing different materials and study the changes in biomechanical properties over time. TERM was constructed by seeding adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) on electrospun poly(L-lactide)-trimethylene carbonate-glycolide (PLTG) terpolymers. The TERM, PLTG, porcine small intestine submucosa mesh (SIS), and polypropylene (PP) (n = 6 / group per time point) were implanted in rats for 7, 30, 60, and 90 days. Hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome staining were used to assess the host response, and mechanical testing was used to evaluate the changes in biomechanical properties. In vivo imaging showed that the ADSCs were confined to the abdominal wall and did not migrate to other organs or tissues. The TERM was encapsulated by a thicker layer of connective tissue and was associated with less reduced inflammatory scores compared with PLTG and PP over time. The vascularization of the TERM was greater than that with PP and PLTG over time (p < 0.05) and was greater than that with SIS on day 90. The ultimate tensile strain and Young's modulus of the PP group showed the greatest increases, and the TERM group followed on day 90. T
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.