Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Evaluation of different sterilization methods for decellularized kidney tissue.

Moradi L., Mohammadi Jobania B., Jafarnezhad-Ansariha F., Ghorbani F., Esmaeil-Pour R., Majidi Zolbina M.

Animal Study on Systemic / IV, published in Tissue Cell (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Tissue Cell (2020)
Country
Scotland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32933719
DOI
10.1016/j.tice.2020.101396
Citations
24

Abstract (original English)

The main goal of this study was to assess the effect of different sterilization treatment for sterilization of decellularized kidney tissue. Rabbit kidneys were decellularized by the perfusion-based method using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Triton X-100. Then, decellularized kidney slices were prepared and sterilized by an antibiotic cocktail, PAA (0.5 %, 1% and 1.5 %), 5KG γ-irradiation and 320-480 nm UV-irradiation. Histological evaluations, DNA quantification assay, MTT assay, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mechanical test and bacterial and fungal culture tests were performed to determine the quality of decellularization and sterilization processes. The kidney slices were seeded by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) to assess the cell adhesion capability after treatment. The results of the current study indicated that PAA 0.5 % was the most efficient method to completely decontaminate rabbit decellularized kidney tissue while preserving the mechanical properties and main components of the matrix which are necessary for cell-matrix interaction and cell adhesion. The 5KG γ-irradiation was determined to be the most destructive sterilization method, with reduced the mechanical strengths as well as altered microstructure of the kidney matrix and no cell adhesion. In addition, UV-irradiation is not able to sterile the decellularized tissues. Therefore PAA 0.5 %

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBacteriaCell DeathDNAFungiKidneyMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsRabbitsSterilization

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research