Evaluation of intracellular labeling with micron-sized particles of iron oxide (MPIOs) as a general tool for in vitro and in vivo tracking of human stem and progenitor cells.
Boulland JL., Leung DS., Thuen M., Vik-Mo E., Joel M., Perreault MC.
Animal Study, published in Cell Transplant (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Cell Transplant (2012)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 22490338
- DOI
- 10.3727/096368911X627598
Abstract (original English)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tracking is increasingly attracting attention as a means of better understanding stem cell dynamics in vivo. Intracellular labeling with micrometer-sized particles of iron oxide (MPIOs) provides a practical MRI-based approach due to superior detectability relative to smaller iron oxide particles. However, insufficient information is available about the general utility across cell types and the effects on cell vitality of MPIO labeling of human stem cells. We labeled six human cell types from different sources: mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow (MSCs), mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue (ASCs), presumptive adult neural stem cells (ad-NSCs), fetal neural progenitor cells (f-NPCs), a glioma cell line (U87), and glioblastoma tumor stem cells (GSCs), with two different sizes of MPIOs (0.9 and 2.84 µm). Labeling and uptake efficiencies were highly variable among cell types. Several parameters of general cell function were tested in vitro. Only minor differences were found between labeled and unlabeled cells with respect to proliferation rate, mitotic duration, random motility, and capacity for differentiation to specific phenotypes. In vivo behavior was tested in chicken embryos and severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. Postmortem histology showed that labeled cells survived and could integrate into various t
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.