Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMedOpen access

Evaluation of Multiple Intravenous Infusions of Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Vij R., Kim H., Park H., Lotfi D., Cheng T., Chang D.

Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 24 on Neuroinflammation, published in Parkinsons Dis (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Parkinsons Dis (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
24
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42137372
PMCID
PMC13168863
DOI
10.1155/padi/9934417
NCT
NCT04928287

Abstract (original English)

Introduction The purpose of this trial was to evaluate preliminary efficacy and safety of multiple intravenous infusions of autologous, Hope Biosciences adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (HB-adMSCs) for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods A total of N = 24 patients with PD were randomized 5:3 into HB-adMSC (200 million) or Placebo. Six intravenous infusions of HB-adMSCs or saline were administered at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 with a follow-up at Week 42 and the end of study (EOS) at Week 52. The primary efficacy endpoint was to investigate change from baseline to Week 52 in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II. Primary safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse and serious adverse events (AE/SAEs) and clinically significant changes in laboratory assessments. Results HB-adMSC treatment was well tolerated and safe, with only one SAE reported, which was deemed unrelated to the investigational product. In total, 81 AEs were recorded, 79 of which were mild, one moderate, and one severe. Neurological disorders were the most commonly reported AEs, with a higher incidence in the placebo group (66.7%) compared with the HB-adMSC group (46.7%). No deaths occurred, and no clinically meaningful changes were observed in laboratory parameters from baseline to the EOS for either group. Efficacy anal

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research