Evaluation of novel biomaterials for cartilage regeneration based on gelatin methacryloyl interpenetrated with extractive chondroitin sulfate or unsulfated biotechnological chondroitin
Vassallo V., Tsianaka A., Alessio N., Grübel J., Cammarota M., Tovar GEM.
Laboratory Study on Cartilage Damage, published in J Biomed Mater Res A (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J Biomed Mater Res A (2022)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 35088923
- PMCID
- PMC9306773
- DOI
- 10.1002/jbm.a.37364
- Citations
- 30
Abstract (original English)
Gelatin is widely proposed as scaffold for cartilage tissue regeneration due to its high similarities to the extracellular matrix. However, poor mechanical properties and high sensitivity to enzymatic degradation encouraged the scientific community to develop strategies to obtain better performing hydrogels. Gelatin networks, specifically gelatin-methacryloyl (GM), have been coupled to hyaluronan or chondroitin sulfate (CS). In this study, we evaluated the biophysical properties of an innovative photocross-linked hydrogel based on GM with the addition of CS or a new unsulfated biotechnological chondroitin (BC). Biophysical, mechanical, and biochemical characterization have been assessed to compare GM hydrogels to the chondroitin containing networks. Moreover, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were seeded on these biomaterials in order to evaluate the differentiation toward the chondrocyte phenotype in 21 days. Rheological characterization showed that both CS and BC increased the stiffness (G' was about 2-fold), providing a stronger rigid matrix, with respect to GM alone. The biological tests confirmed the onset of MSCs differentiation process starting from 14 days of in vitro culture. In particular, the combination GM + BC resulted to be more effective than GM + CS in the up-regulation of key genes such as collagen type 2A1 (COLII), SOX-9, and aggrecan). In addition, the scanning m
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci