Evaluation of single CpG sites as proxies of CpG island methylation states at the genome scale
Barrera V., Peinado MA.
Laboratory Study, published in Nucleic Acids Res (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Nucleic Acids Res (2012)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 23066096
- PMCID
- PMC3526261
- DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks928
- Citations
- 35
Abstract (original English)
Methylation of a CpG island is a faithful marker of silencing of its associated gene. Different approaches report the methylation status of a CpG island based on the determination of one or a few CpG sites by assuming the homogeneity of methylation along the element. This strategy is frequently applied in both locus-specific and genome-wide studies, but often without a validation of the representativeness of the interrogated CpG site compared with the whole element. We have evaluated the predictive informativeness of the HpaII sites located in CpG islands using data from high-resolution methylome maps, which offer the possibility to assess the methylation homogeneity of each CpG island and to determine the reporter accuracy of single sites as surrogate markers. An excellent correlation was observed between the HpaII and CpG island methylation levels (r > 0.93). At the qualitative level, the predictive sensitivity of HpaII was >95% with >92% specificity for methylated CpG islands and >90% sensitivity with >95% specificity for unmethylated CpG islands. This analysis provides a global validation framework for strategies based on the use of the methylation-sensitive HpaII restriction enzyme.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.