Evaluation of sterilisation methods for bio-ink components: gelatin, gelatin methacryloyl, hyaluronic acid and hyaluronic acid methacryloyl.
O'Connell CD., Onofrillo C., Duchi S., Li X., Zhang Y., Tian P.
Animal Study, published in Biofabrication (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Biofabrication (2019)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 30818298
- DOI
- 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0b7c
Abstract (original English)
Reliable and scalable sterilisation of hydrogels is critical to the clinical translation of many biofabrication approaches, such as extrusion-based 3D bioprinting of cell-laden bio-inks. However sterilisation methods can be destructive, and may have detrimental effects on the naturally-derived hydrogels that constitute much of the bio-ink palette. Determining effective sterilisation methods requires detailed analysis of the effects of sterilisation on relevant properties such as viscosity, printability and cytocompatibility. Yet there have been no studies specifically exploring the effects of sterilisation on bio-inks to date. In this work, we explored the effects of various sterilisation techniques on four of the most widely used bio-ink components: gelatin, gelatin methacryloyl, hyaluronic acid, and hyaluronic acid methacrylate. Autoclaving was the most destructive sterilisation method, producing large reductions in viscosity and in mechanical properties following crosslinking. Filter sterilisation caused some reduction in rheological properties of GelMA due to removal of higher molecular weight components, but did not affect photocrosslinking. Ethylene oxide (EtO) was the least destructive sterilisation method in terms of rheological properties for all materials, had no detrimental effect on the photocrosslinkable methacrylate/methacrylamide groups, and so was chosen for mor
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.