Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Evaluation of the viability and osteogenic differentiation of cryopreserved human adipose-derived stem cells.

Liu G., Zhou H., Li Y., Li G., Cui L., Liu W.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Cryobiology (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cryobiology (2008)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18495102
DOI
10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.04.002
Citations
64

Abstract (original English)

Human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and thus the potential therapeutic use to tissue-engineer bone, so a reliable method for cell storage is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine whether a simple method of cryopreservation with 10% Me(2)SO as a protectant had an effect on proliferation potential and osteogenic differentiation of ASCs isolated from fresh human adipose tissue. ASCs were harvested from 6 human lipoaspirates and each was halved for either cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen for 2 weeks or for control culture. Cells from the second-passage were plated at a density of 5000cells/well in 24-well plates and cultured with or without osteogenic media for 14 days. Cell surface antigens were used to identify the cryopreserved ASCs by flow cytometry. The proliferation rate of both populations was evaluated using a cell DNA assay. To detect osteogenic differentiation of both the cryopreserved and non-cryopreserved populations, determination of osteoblastic protein production (alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin) and excellular matrix calcification (calcium content) was applied. The expression of osteoblastic-associated genes was also analyzed using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. These results demonstrate that cryopreservation has no effect on the phenotype, proliferation or osteogenic differ

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueAdultCell DifferentiationCell SurvivalCells, CulturedCryopreservationDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleFlow Cytometry

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research