The Evolution of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Dey Hazra RO., Ernat JJ., Rakowski DR., Boykin RE., Millett PJ.
Narrative Review on Rotator Cuff, published in Orthop J Sports Med (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Orthop J Sports Med (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 34901288
- PMCID
- PMC8652190
- DOI
- 10.1177/23259671211050899
- Citations
- 48
Abstract (original English)
Over the past 30 years, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has evolved to become the gold standard in treating rotator cuff pathology. As procedural concepts of ARCR continue to improve, it is also continually compared with the open rotator cuff repair as the historical standard of care. This review highlights the evolution of ARCR, including a historical perspective; the anatomic, clinical, and surgical implications of the development of an arthroscopic approach; how arthroscopy improved some of the problems of the open approach; adaptations in techniques and technologies associated with ARCR; future perspectives in orthobiologics as they pertain to ARCR; and lastly, the clinical improvements, or lack of improvements, with all of these adaptations.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Comparison of nonsurgical treatment approaches for partial rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 137 on Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 137
JSES Rev Rep Tech - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The role of injections of mesenchymal stem cells as an augmentation tool in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 5
JSES Rev Rep Tech - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Poor consideration of tissue loading in randomised trials of MSC interventions for tendon pathology: A systematic review using the TIDieR framework.
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in J Exp Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
J Exp Orthop - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Combined arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation shows similar functional outcomes but a higher structural integrity rate compared with isolated repair: a meta-analysis of comparative stu
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 415 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Int (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 415
JSES Int