Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Exosome-based vaccines in cancer immunotherapy: antitumor mechanisms, engineering strategies, and challenges

Zhou H., Shi Y., Wang Y., Bai G.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41843206
PMCID
PMC12996485
DOI
10.1007/s00432-026-06435-7

Abstract (original English)

Exosome-based vaccines hold significant promise in cancer immunotherapy, yet their native forms face inherent challenges, including imprecise targeting, suboptimal immunogenicity, and poor controllability of antigen loading. This review posits that engineering is pivotal to transforming exosomes from passive carriers into active, programmable therapeutic platforms. We systematically dissect the multifaceted antitumor mechanisms of exosomes and critically evaluate how various engineering strategies (e.g., physical loading, genetic modification, membrane functionalization) are designed to address these specific biological bottlenecks, thereby establishing a coherent "biological limitation-engineering solution" framework. Building on this foundation, we assess their application potential and ongoing challenges in areas such as personalized neoantigen vaccines.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsCancer VaccinesAntigens, NeoplasmImmunotherapyExosomes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research