Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Experimental morphological rationale for the use of cultures of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells in combination with biomaterials in the reconstruction of the pelvic floor].

Pavlov VN., Yashchuk AG., Musin II., Mufazalova NA., Shangina OR., Fatkullina IB.

Animal Study on Chronic Inflammation, published in Urologiia (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Urologiia (2019)
Country
Russia (Federation)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31535802
DOI
10.18565/urology.2019.4.32-37

Abstract (original English)

To date, descension of the pelvic floor is a fairly common gynecological pathology that requires surgical treatment. The development of cellular technologies suggests that the use of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MMSC) in the treatment of this pathology can stimulate the regeneration of damaged tissue and contribute to the reconstruction of the structures of the pelvic floor. Objective to evaluate the effectiveness of using MMSC in combination with biological and synthetic materials in vitro and in vivo with descension of the pelvic floor. Materials and methods Sprague Dawley rats 10 weeks old weighing 200 grams were used in the experiment. Under sterile conditions, mechanical damage to the posterior wall of the vagina was carried out, with the restoration of which vicryl 3-0 was used. On the 2nd and 4th day, the wound was cut off in a volume of 1.5 ml with xenograft, allograft and multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MMSC) (5 thousand cells) obtained from the adipose tissue of rats. In the control group was not used biological material. At the second stage of the experiment, the compatibility of the mesh prosthesis with MMSC and allograft in vitro was evaluated. Results and discussion xenograft does not lead to full tissue regeneration, but contributes to rapid epithelialization and reduces the degree of inflammatory reaction in the wound during the regeneration of connec

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleMesenchymal Stem CellsPelvic FloorPolypropylenesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySurgical Mesh

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research