Experimental and In Silico Approaches to Study Carboxylesterase Substrate Specificity
Ribone SR., Quevedo MA.
Narrative Review, published in J Xenobiot (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Xenobiot (2026)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41562770
- PMCID
- PMC12821581
- DOI
- 10.3390/jox16010011
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Human carboxylesterases (CES) are enzymes that play a central role in the metabolism and biotransformation of diverse endogenous substances and xenobiotics. The two most relevant isoforms, CES1 and CES2, are crucial in clinical pharmacotherapy as they catalyze the hydrolysis of numerous approved drugs and prodrugs. Elucidating the structural basis of CES isoform substrate specificity is essential not only for understanding and anticipating the biological fate of administered drugs, but also for designing prodrugs with optimized site-specific bioactivation. Additionally, this knowledge is also important for the design of biomedically useful molecules such as subtype-targeted CES inhibitors and fluorescent probes. In this context, both experimental and computational methodologies have been used to explore the mechanistic and thermodynamic properties of CES-mediated catalysis. Experimental designs commonly employ recombinant CES or human tissue microsomes as enzyme sources, utilizing quantification methods such as spectrophotometry (UV and fluorescence) and mass spectrometry. Computational approaches fall into two categories: (1) modeling substrate: CES recognition and affinity (molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and free-energy binding calculations), and (2) modeling substrate: CES reaction coordinates (hybrid QM/MM simulations). While experimental and theoretical
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.