[Experimental substantiation of medical device design for mechanical processing of adipose tissue].
Eremin II., Vasiliev VS., Tikhomirov AN., Chibizov PE., Briko AN., Kotenko KV.
Laboratory Study, published in Khirurgiia (Mosk) (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Khirurgiia (Mosk) (2024)
- Country
- Russia (Federation)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 39665353
- DOI
- 10.17116/hirurgia2024122101
Abstract (original English)
To substantiate the medical device design for mechanical processing of adipose tissue. Enzymatic method using collagenase and mechanical method for obtaining the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) are compared. The authors emphasized the disadvantages of enzymatic method, such as high cost and duration of process. The main criteria for developing the design were cell viability after processing of adipose tissue and available processing in a minimum number of passages manually without automated mechanical stands. The proposed design allows two unidirectional passages to obtain processed lipoaspirate for SVF harvesting. Experimental studies demonstrate that meshes with a minimum cell size of 100 μm allow high cell viability comparable to enzymatic method. Moreover, this design can be used to develop a disposable medical device. Our results will underlie development of a disposable medical device for mechanical processing of adipose tissue. Обосновать конструкцию медицинского изделия для механической обработки жировой ткани. Выполнено сравнение ферментативного метода с использованием коллагеназы и механического метода получения стромально-васкулярной фракции (СВФ), при этом акцентируется внимание на недостатках ферментативного метода, таких как высокая стоимость и длительность процесса. Основными критериями при разработке конструкции являлись выживаемость клеток после обработки жиров
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.